Jump to content

TransEdit Discussion


Recommended Posts

TransEdit 3.5.1.0, a bug in the interface:

 

It look good when opening:

 

091223194650d2d2ceaf4de0cf.jpg

 

But when click "Alt" key on keyboard, lots of controls on the interface are gone:

 

09122319457ecb39ed348f0683.jpg

 

 

I'm using Windows 7 Aero.

 

Please note: This issue is there on all the sub-windows, like the Analyze, Blindscan, DiSEqC Edit windows, etc.

Link to comment
I'll add a fix, but I can't test whether it works or not.

 

I can test the new version when it's available.

 

UPDATE: This issue has been fixed in TransEdit 3.5.2.0. Thanks!

 

because I only use XP.

 

Hope all the DVBViewer authors can upgrade to Windows 7 w/ Aero, :biggrin:

now the 4.3 beta version EVR Custom Renderer is not stable with Win7 Aero...

Edited by ter9999
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like TransEdit don't update correctly the group option when there is the channel with the same name but fom the another Category (not same group option) within the same Root.

Link to comment

Unfortunately I didn't keep the before upgrading channel list version. When I tried to reproduce the bug, it appeared to the other channels.

 

1. Scaned transponder.

2. Pressed to Select all

3. Select Group B

4. Chose Root

5. Click Add update

 

As a result, for some channels of the transponder was set group A, and for some group B.

Link to comment

Here is my channel list. Look Eutelsat Sesat & W4 36.0 ° / Poverkhnost TV / group was not correctly set for channels 1089602318 | Sport 2 1089667855 | TiJi, 1089733392 | Gulli. For other channels of the transponder group is set correctly.

Edited by evgen_ln
Link to comment

TransEdit doesn't change user defined settings like DiSEqC, channel group etc. when updating channels. That's the expected behaviour, and that's what happens here.

 

However, new channels are added with the TransEdit settings or, in case of settings that are not handled by TransEdit, with default presets.

 

Double entries in the channel list should be avoided, because DVBViewer can't distinguish them in certain situations, even if the category, DiSEqC or the channel group is different, and TransEdit only updates the first one, because a scan result comprises a single link to an already existing channel, not a list of links.

Link to comment

I understand what you mean. But surely it would be logical to check the channel settings found on the channels list (frequency, polarization) according to the scan results before upgrading. This will avoid ambiguities.

Link to comment

Don't know if authors are thinking to integrate TransEdit MORE with DVBViewer, this could be an endeavor but a correct move -- More engineering parameters will be displayed including the TP analysis and channel CAT, etc.

Link to comment
it would be logical to check the channel settings found on the channels list (frequency, polarization) according to the scan results before upgrading.

That's what TransEdit does. From the TransEdit manual:

 

For recognizing a scan result in the DVBViewer's channel list, the tuner type and the following transponder parameters must match: Frequency (DVB-S/T/C, ATSC), symbolrate (DVB-S/C), polarisation (DVB-S), plus the service ID or alternatively the video and audio PID. Additionally TransEdit compares the orbital position for distinguishing different satellite positions, provided it is available in the DVBViewer channel list data.

So what do you want?

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

TransEdit 3.5.2.0 and DVBViewer 4.3.1.66B can't interact correctly:

 

If the DVB device is already used in DVBViewer, then analyze another TP (on another sat) in TransEdit using the same DVB device, sometimes, there will be no prompt and TransEdit just analyzes out nothing; sometimes, TransEdit will prompt: "Sorry - there is no DVB-S2 device available or it is not configured as DVB-S2 device."

 

Please check. I remember TransEdit prompted "Device already in use" in former TransEdit version.

Edited by ter9999
Link to comment
Here it works as expected.

 

There may be discrepancies in the TransEdit and DVBViewer Pro device list. Please check it, or attach a support.zip so I can do it.

 

I attached my support.zip here.

 

Yes, they use different sets. So I suggest to integrate TransEdit more into DVBViewer. Something like, the "missing packages", etc to an engineering menu in DVBViewer.

 

 

Link to comment

The relevant data in hardware.xml matches the data in the [Hardware] section of TransEdit.ini:

 

	<entry name="InstID">TeVii DVB-S/S2 Receiver 0</entry>
Name.0=TeVii DVB-S/S2 Receiver
DeviceNr.0=0

<entry name="InstID">DTV-DVB Mantis DVBC BDA Receiver 1</entry>
Name.1=DTV-DVB Mantis DVBC BDA Receiver
DeviceNr.1=1

<entry name="InstID">LME_PCTV_ABSS_AVALINK1108 2</entry>
Name.2=LME_PCTV_ABSS_AVALINK1108
DeviceNr.2=2

<entry name="InstID">AmazePc DMB8G75 3</entry>
Name.3=AmazePc DMB8G75
DeviceNr.3=3

 

...so I don't know what's going on.

Link to comment

Hi there,

 

the new version of Progdvb v6.32.7, permit to scan a list of satellites. Is any method that Transedit to do that?

I think it is very helpful, because i let alone my computer 2 hours and after that the channel list is ready.

Link to comment
Not necessary with transedit because it scans several times faster than progdvb :(

..can't tell about scanning speed of progdvb but the time that transedit needs depends on the scanning parameters and last not least on the hardware. When there's no reception, my TeVii DVB-S2 card takes endless time before starting to tune the next frequency :bye:

Link to comment
Not necessary with transedit because it scans several times faster than progdvb :bye:

 

Yes , is faster, but it still take 6 hrs to scan satellites from 31.3E to 30W. In this time, I must remain at the computer to pres scan all to each satellite. Really I prefer to use this time to make something else, maybe to sleep.

Link to comment
  • 6 years later...
  • 1 month later...

NIT

known why no added in list all transponders from NIT actual table (TransEdit 4.1.2.0 & 3.9.8.0) ?

 

capture_001_17092016_120535.png

manual create list and initilal transponder

 

capture_005_17092016_120723.png

in NIT analyse show 11 transponders from actual table

 

capture_003_17092016_120638.png

scan progres show 12 transponders (1 manual addef before scan + 11 from NIT table)

 

capture_002_17092016_120606.png

scan result

 

capture_004_17092016_120649.png

after scan addded in INI file only 7 transponders

 

 

00 40 F0 F9 00 03 C7 00 00 F0 1B

40 07 41535452412033

4A 07 0C98 0003 00 00 04

4A 07 0C91 0003 18 2E 07

F0 D1

7993 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012725.50 0235 8E 030000 06*

7989 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012525.00 0235 8E 027500 04*

7991 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012685.00 0235 8E 030000 06

0C98 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012168.00 0235 A0 027500 03*

0C97 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012148.50 0235 8E 027500 04*

0C81 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 011719.50 0235 8E 028200 09*

0C83 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 011758.50 0235 8E 028200 06

0C91 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012031.50 0235 8D 027500 09*

0C9F 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012304 50 0235 8E 027500 04*

0CA1 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012343.50 0235 8E 030000 06

0CA3 0003 F0 0D 43 0B 012382.50 0235 8E 028200 06

39 40 26 8E

Edited by EnoSat
Link to comment
after scan addded in INI file only 7 transponders

 

Sometimes providers enumerate out-dated transponders or transponders with wrong reception parameters in the NIT

 

That's why TransEdit checks if transponders from the NIT can be received (if data arrives after they have been tuned) and automatically removes them from the list if they cannot be received.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Working preview undefined video stream from TS ?

etc. videopid 32 and 33 on 12722H/19 East

 

after preview , show only black window (test with LAV and MS-DTV codec in 4.1.2 and 3.9.8)

 

info from record pid:

General
Complete name : C:\Users\Heno\Videos\Astra 1 12721.75 H 10-02 11-44-49.ts
Format : MPEG-TS
Format profile : No PAT/PMT
File size : 2.87 MiB
Duration : 1mn 9s
Overall bit rate : 346 Kbps
Video
ID : 32 (0x20)
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L3
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
Format settings, GOP : M=4, N=28
Duration : 1mn 9s
Bit rate : 329 Kbps
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 576 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 25.000 fps
Standard : Component
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Scan order : Top Field First
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.032
Stream size : 2.73 MiB (95%)
Color range : Limited
Color primaries : BT.601 PAL
Transfer characteristics : BT.470 System B, BT.470 System G
Matrix coefficients : BT.601
Edited by EnoSat
Link to comment

The Analyzer doesn't know the format since there is no PAT/PMT entry, so the Preview assumes MPEG2 video as default, which is wrong. That's why it doesn't play in TransEdit. The Header Info shows that it is H.264.

 

You can record the video stream with TransEdit and play it in DVBViewer (also while it is recorded).

Link to comment

The Analyzer doesn't know the format since there is no PAT/PMT entry, so the Preview assumes MPEG2 video as default, which is wrong. That's why it doesn't play in TransEdit. The Header Info shows that it is H.264.

 

You can record the video stream with TransEdit and play it in DVBViewer (also while it is recorded).

maybe added info from Header info for detect Preview ?

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...