Jump to content

DVBViewer and skystar 2 in an ideal environment


vonMengen

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

sorry but I couldn`t resist :)

 

almost no problems with my new rig and for the first time I reached

 

0 cpu load mpeg 2 SD for a couple of seconds :-)

9 % mpeg 2 HDTV

28 % H.264 HDTV (cyberlink)

 

 

config .:

 

asus p5 DLX - Intel core2duo E 6600 @ 3,2 GHz - MSI 7600 GT HD (HDCP)

 

in a silverstone HTPC case and in a silent config ..

 

this is kind of an ideal cpu for htpcs :

 

the cpu is so powerful that it isn`t interested in this kind of simple loads (DVBViewer +SD) and so immediately intels speedstep technology kicks in and

 

puts the processor to sleep at half of the rated speed and voltage :bye:

 

best

 

vm

Edited by vonMengen
Posted
the cpu is so powerful that it isn`t interested in this kind of simple loads (DVBViewer +SD) and so immediately intels speedstep technology kicks in and

 

puts the processor to sleep at half of the rated speed and voltage :bye:

 

best

 

vm

Hy !

 

And still no flaws , errors in he recordet Video ?

Great !

On an 3000 Athlon 64 DVBViewer runs recording w/o AV enabled also 0-1 % CPU load.

Posted (edited)
Hy !

 

And still no flaws , errors in he recordet Video ?

Great !

On an 3000 Athlon 64 DVBViewer runs recording w/o AV enabled also 0-1 % CPU load.

 

 

perrrrrrfect

 

compared with our athlon 64 x 3200 rig

 

more than twice as fast

 

some facts :

 

SuperPi bench @ 3780 MHz in 13,7 sec

 

cinema 4d Bench mp: 1200 score

_____

 

current world record amd :

 

> 20sec

 

SuperPi bench

Athlon 64 FX-57 @4056 Mhz

 

http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL256/13243...2/136368937.jpg

 

 

:bye::):arrow::arrow:

Edited by vonMengen
Posted

Hello !

 

Well , I say it with Churchil :

I only belive statistics that I have faked myself.

 

In other words: Do not belive one benchmark.

Of course Intel is at the moment some % faster in some benchmarks.

So what.

Price/Power faktor still speaks for AMD.

 

And I started with digital Video on a PIII 450 Mhz,

so todays actual CPUs are a revelation compared to that days.

And pay 100% more for 5 % more Power?

No , I have a wife and two children :bye:

Posted
Hello !

 

Well , I say it with Churchil :

I only belive statistics that I have faked myself.

 

In other words: Do not belive one benchmark.

Of course Intel is at the moment some % faster in some benchmarks.

So what.

Price/Power faktor still speaks for AMD.

 

And I started with digital Video on a PIII 450 Mhz,

so todays actual CPUs are a revelation compared to that days.

And pay 100% more for 5 % more Power?

No , I have a wife and two children :bye:

 

hi bergh

 

I faked the benches for myself :-)

 

honest :

 

believe me :its a new dimension in raw cp horsepower

and I am totally overwhelmed

 

and nice :

I started with digitalvideo on a mac quadra 6080 with 33 MHz

and SCSI raid 0 arrays in 1991 - digitizer card by truevision

software by avid :-)

 

best

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...