quentin666 Posted Monday at 03:04 PM Posted Monday at 03:04 PM Hello, I have recently upgrade to version 3.3.2.0. Since, i'm experiencing some issues (maybe database corruption): - Some recording titles were corrupted (some had something like "99999", other had "no description" instead). It seems to affects only the WEB streams/channels. - When I want to schedule a recurring recording, BUT start at a specific date (eg. we are today 2026-06-22 and I want a recurring Mon-Fri to start in the future on the 2026-06-29), it resets it to the closest next date (in my case, 2026-06-23) Please note: It has nothing to do with the self-signed certificate. I have first upgraded DVBViewer Pro 7.3.2.0 and then DVBViewer Media Server 3.3.2.0 without problem bypassing the warning from Microsoft. Best regards, Quentin Quote
Griga Posted Monday at 04:15 PM Posted Monday at 04:15 PM vor einer Stunde schrieb quentin666: maybe database corruption For checking this a support.zip would be required. vor einer Stunde schrieb quentin666: Some recording titles were corrupted (some had something like "99999", other had "no description" instead). No such issue here. Are only recent (3.3.2) recordings affected or old ones too? Where do the corrupted titles appear? Are they still corrupted when returning to 3.3.1? vor einer Stunde schrieb quentin666: When I want to schedule a recurring recording, BUT start at a specific date (eg. we are today 2026-06-22 and I want a recurring Mon-Fri to start in the future on the 2026-06-29), it resets it to the closest next date (in my case, 2026-06-23) Confirmed. It's due to requests by other users that required to allow back-dating. Don't know if what you want can be somehow combined with what others want... needs to be checked. Quote
quentin666 Posted Monday at 07:06 PM Author Posted Monday at 07:06 PM Hi Griga, Thank you for your quick answer. 2 hours ago, Griga said: For checking this a support.zip would be required. I've attached it. 2 hours ago, Griga said: No such issue here. Are only recent (3.3.2) recordings affected or old ones too? Where do the corrupted titles appear? Are they still corrupted when returning to 3.3.1? That was not the recording names, they look fine, but the title entries showed in the Timer section. Unfortunately I can't take screenshots because I've deleted them and re-created them. 2 hours ago, Griga said: Confirmed. It's due to requests by other users that required to allow back-dating. Don't know if what you want can be somehow combined with what others want... needs to be checked. I see, so there no easy way to get back to the previous behavior? support.zip Quote
Griga Posted Tuesday at 05:07 AM Posted Tuesday at 05:07 AM vor 13 Stunden schrieb quentin666: maybe database corruption I can see no indications of a database corruption in the svcdebug.log. vor 13 Stunden schrieb quentin666: Some recording titles were corrupted (some had something like "99999", other had "no description" instead). It seems to affects only the WEB streams/channels. (...) That was not the recording names, they look fine, but the title entries showed in the Timer section. I guess you are using an imported EPG for the Web streams. Maybe something was wrong with this data. Were only recurring recordings affected? vor 9 Stunden schrieb quentin666: I see, so there no easy way to get back to the previous behavior? I don't know yet. Has to be investigated. Quote
quentin666 Posted Tuesday at 08:36 AM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:36 AM 3 hours ago, Griga said: I guess you are using an imported EPG for the Web streams. Maybe something was wrong with this data. Were only recurring recordings affected? No, the recording title was set manually. In my case that was these two streams: http://novazz.ice.infomaniak.ch/novazz-128.mp3 https://streaming.nrjaudio.fm/oufdfatx4thg They were all recurring (I didn't had any one-time scheduled recordings). I found another issue: I record a radio channel 24h a day, scheduled as follow: Repeat: every day Start: 00:00 End: 23:59 Follow-up time: 1 It seems to be completely skipped, not recording anymore now. I never had any of these problems with the previous versions, only since I've upgraded to 3.3.2. I am now considering rolling back to 7.3.1/3.3.1... Is it safe to do, even after that upgrade? Thank you for your support. Quote
Griga Posted Tuesday at 03:52 PM Posted Tuesday at 03:52 PM vor 7 Stunden schrieb quentin666: I am now considering rolling back to 7.3.1/3.3.1... Is it safe to do, even after that upgrade? Should work without problems. For investigating the issues I need more time. Are all your timers recurring? Quote
quentin666 Posted Tuesday at 07:28 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 07:28 PM 3 hours ago, Griga said: Should work without problems. It seems to work. I am now waiting midnight to see if the 24/24 recording restarts as usual. 3 hours ago, Griga said: For investigating the issues I need more time. Are all your timers recurring? All my timers are recurring. Thanks for investigating! Quote
Griga Posted yesterday at 07:24 AM Posted yesterday at 07:24 AM (edited) Am 22.6.2026 um 17:04 schrieb quentin666: When I want to schedule a recurring recording, BUT start at a specific date (eg. we are today 2026-06-22 and I want a recurring Mon-Fri to start in the future on the 2026-06-29), it resets it to the closest next date (in my case, 2026-06-23) Let's assume today (24.06.) a user creates a recurring timer that is supposed to start a recording each Saturday and Sunday at 22:00. The Media Server automatically sets the next recording date to 27.06. So far ok. Now the user detects that the broadcast in question is also running on Friday, edits the timer and checks Friday in the timer dialog: Version 3.3.1 will start no recording next Friday, because the next recording date of a recurring timer is never back-dated. <addition> However, the user could perform back-dating manually in the timer dialog when editing the timer. </addition> Version 3.3.2 will start the recording next Friday, because it automatically back-dates recurring timers to the first possible recording date, except if this would trigger immediate execution, because the start time has already passed (otherwise stopping the recording manually before the end time is reached would trigger an immediate restart). Can you see the problem? Edited yesterday at 08:45 AM by Griga Addition Quote
Griga Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Am 23.6.2026 um 10:36 schrieb quentin666: I found another issue: I record a radio channel 24h a day, scheduled as follow: Repeat: every day Start: 00:00 End: 23:59 Follow-up time: 1 It seems to be completely skipped, not recording anymore now. Confirmed. I've tried it with a timer from 12:10 to 12:09. This is a bug. Probably an unwanted side effect of the "except if this would trigger immediate execution" rule mentioned above. I will look for a fix. Quote
quentin666 Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago 2 hours ago, Griga said: Let's assume today (24.06.) a user creates a recurring timer that is supposed to start a recording each Saturday and Sunday at 22:00. The Media Server automatically sets the next recording date to 27.06. So far ok. Now the user detects that the broadcast in question is also running on Friday, edits the timer and checks Friday in the timer dialog: Version 3.3.1 will start no recording next Friday, because the next recording date of a recurring timer is never back-dated. <addition> However, the user could perform back-dating manually in the timer dialog when editing the timer. </addition> Version 3.3.2 will start the recording next Friday, because it automatically back-dates recurring timers to the first possible recording date, except if this would trigger immediate execution, because the start time has already passed (otherwise stopping the recording manually before the end time is reached would trigger an immediate restart). Can you see the problem? Yes, I understand the behavior. If it is done intentionally, I could live with it (with still a preference for the old behavior). 2 minutes ago, Griga said: Confirmed. I've tried it with a timer from 12:10 to 12:09. This is a bug. Probably an unwanted side effect of the "except if this would trigger immediate execution" rule mentioned above. I will look for a fix. I was about asking but just saw you already replied. Great, thank you very much for your quick investigation! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.