Jump to content

Graphic card


TPO

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I´m a new user of DVBViewer Pro.

 

I installed the application on a fresh P4 Dualcore 2.8GHz computer with 2GB RAM

and a Nvidia Gforce 7300LE graphic card. I also have a TT Budget S3200 DVB-S2 card installed.

I use the codecs which came along with the TT-card (PowerDVD).

 

I got it all working fine after the installation and followed some very good advice from this excelent forum.

so I think the settings in the application is done correctly.

 

When watching H.264 channels from Thor 2/3 (DVB-S2) the CPU utilisation is between 80-100%

The picture runs almost smoothly, but I´m not 100% satisfied.

 

My question is if I would get a better result with an other graphic card which could ofload the CPU

or should the 7300LE card be good enough.

 

I also bought a CoreAVC codec, but had to do a reinstallation of the OS (WinXP MCE 2005 2:nd rollout) and after that I can´t reinstall the CoreAVC-codec (stupid licensing policy from Corecodec !!!) I will not purchase a new codec every time I decide to change OS or must do a OS-reinstallation

(I think I´m not the only one who is an entusiastic hobbyist doing experiments on a computer!)

 

Please advice!

Link to comment
Hi,

 

I´m a new user of DVBViewer Pro.

 

I installed the application on a fresh P4 Dualcore 2.8GHz computer with 2GB RAM

and a Nvidia Gforce 7300LE graphic card. I also have a TT Budget S3200 DVB-S2 card installed.

I use the codecs which came along with the TT-card (PowerDVD).

 

I got it all working fine after the installation and followed some very good advice from this excelent forum.

so I think the settings in the application is done correctly.

 

When watching H.264 channels from Thor 2/3 (DVB-S2) the CPU utilisation is between 80-100%

The picture runs almost smoothly, but I´m not 100% satisfied.

 

My question is if I would get a better result with an other graphic card which could ofload the CPU

or should the 7300LE card be good enough.

 

I also bought a CoreAVC codec, but had to do a reinstallation of the OS (WinXP MCE 2005 2:nd rollout) and after that I can´t reinstall the CoreAVC-codec (stupid licensing policy from Corecodec !!!) I will not purchase a new codec every time I decide to change OS or must do a OS-reinstallation

(I think I´m not the only one who is an entusiastic hobbyist doing experiments on a computer!)

 

Please advice!

 

I have two graphic cards: Geforce 7600GS and Radeon X1550. I have just started to exprerience the ATI card but seems that Nvidia is far better with H.264 stuff. So, I your case upgrading the card to more high end Nvidia card might help a little. I have found the best picture quality with the following settings:

- overlay of unchanged (= VMR7 windowed) video renderer

- Cyberlink coded with DXVA enabled

 

CoreAVC is not giving acceptable picture quality to me.

 

With VMR7 and VMR9 I have loss of synchronization caused by OSD mixing which cause jitter and lost frames. This happens equally with Nvidia and ATI cards.

Link to comment

You may see a little reduction in CPU utilisation (perhaps 10%) if you upgrade to a 7600GT but the basic problem is that Your CPU is not fast enough for smooth h.264 decoding. You need a minimum of a Athlon 64 X2 3800+

Link to comment

Thanks Mitsu and Nigel :)

 

I have the same settings as Mitsu

- Overlay of unchanged (= VMR7 windowed) video renderer

- Cyberlink coded with DXVA enabled

 

I also had a feeling that the CPU is not strong enough. Dualcore technology doesn´t seem to

help either.

 

I will try to upgrade to a stronger Nvidia card. 10% boost in performance should fix the problem

because the current performance is almost satisfactory.

 

If this doesn´t help I might buy a new computer :radscorpion: .

 

/TPO

Link to comment
Thanks Mitsu and Nigel :)

 

I have the same settings as Mitsu

- Overlay of unchanged (= VMR7 windowed) video renderer

- Cyberlink coded with DXVA enabled

 

I also had a feeling that the CPU is not strong enough. Dualcore technology doesn´t seem to

help either.

 

I will try to upgrade to a stronger Nvidia card. 10% boost in performance should fix the problem

because the current performance is almost satisfactory.

 

If this doesn´t help I might buy a new computer :radscorpion: .

 

/TPO

 

I have a 3.2G P4 with HT running at 3.6G and a Radeon 7600GS. That configuration is just enough for H.264 reception with 20.4 M bitarate.

 

I guess you have allowed using both CPUs.

 

Anyway, I think upgrading the CPU would be cheaper and give more performance improvement.

Link to comment
I have a 3.2G P4 with HT running at 3.6G and a Radeon 7600GS. That configuration is just enough for H.264 reception with 20.4 M bitarate.

 

I guess you have allowed using both CPUs.

 

Anyway, I think upgrading the CPU would be cheaper and give more performance improvement.

 

Yes I´ve unchecked the "use only first cpu" in DVBViewer

 

Probably youre right about CPU-upgrade. An Intel Pentium D 960 3.6GHz CPU is a better investment than a new GPU.

Link to comment
Yes I´ve unchecked the "use only first cpu" in DVBViewer

 

Probably youre right about CPU-upgrade. An Intel Pentium D 960 3.6GHz CPU is a better investment than a new GPU.

 

The VMR modes are more CPU intensive as the overlay mode.

For AC3: you better use the AC3filter1.11

 

on ATI: don't enable the nvidia fix on VRM modes.

on Nvidia: sure enable nvidia fix.

 

I did download a mpeg4/h264 test file a while ago that played fine but that was too short.

A test sample should be 2 tot 3 minutes long for short.Now before I confirm this, then someone shoul give a link with a better demo cause our system is not so fast at all.

Link to comment

OK Guys,

 

I upgraded with an Intel Pentium D 945 3,4 GHz (approx. 100 Eur) and got enough improvment

1920x1088 25fps 20,2 Mbit at 78% CPU load. I´m so happy with the result :radscorpion:

 

Thanks for your advice

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...