mr_chaela Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Just recorded a prog on BBCHD and find I have 3 copies of the recording. It appears that 3 people in the family had set the recording (epg - press red). Quote Link to comment
Tjod Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 If you scheduling three recording three files are correct. Quote Link to comment
Derrick Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 If you scheduling three recording three files are correct. Describing the production of three (or 4 if granny is also using this feature ) identical copies as correct, it can imho only mean that the thread starter described the problem correctly All copies are written to the same location, so some mechanism to reduce this crap should be in place. Quote Link to comment
Lars_MQ Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 No bug here. Please explain the family the use of the timers window. Quote Link to comment
mr_chaela Posted January 24, 2008 Author Share Posted January 24, 2008 All copies are written to the same location, so some mechanism to reduce this crap should be in place. Agree entirely, wouldn't have thought it beyond the obvious skills of the DVBViewer team to include a little routine whereby subsequent requests to record the same program simply overwrite the original (in case the start and finish overlap times have been changed). Would save a lot of disk space and save the family from having to leave post-it notes on the screen in case somebody else sets the recording. Perhaps I need to put this in the feature request section. Quote Link to comment
dgdg Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 (edited) whereby subsequent requests to record the same program simply overwrite the original (in case the start and finish overlap times have been changed). Here we have the first conflict. I don't like DVBViewer to overwrite an existing timer programming with a different overlap time. Because sometimes I add addition overlap time (e.g. in case of live transmissons directly before the recorded film). This would than be overwritten by any other family member. If you want to do such things, you have to deal with user management and priorities. Maybe I would agree to skip timer entries that are 100% identically. But in general I don't like software that tries to be more smartly than me. I prefere to delete the addition copies manually. Edited January 24, 2008 by dgdg Quote Link to comment
mr_chaela Posted January 24, 2008 Author Share Posted January 24, 2008 (edited) ... Because sometimes I add addition overlap time (e.g. in case of live transmissons directly before the recorded film). This would than be overwritten by any other family member. A simple pop-up with the message 'Scheduled recording exists. Overwrite Y/N?' would solve that one, Other members of the family are instructed to always answer No. But I do concede that only overwriting identical entries would solve the problem for a majority of users. However, such a pop-up is no more complex than the 'extended exit' or the 'resume playback or start over' pop-ups. Edited January 24, 2008 by mr_chaela Quote Link to comment
Griga Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 A simple pop-up with the message 'Scheduled recording exists. Overwrite Y/N?' would solve that one So please tell us: Under which conditions shall two scheduled recordings be regarded as equal? There are at least eight properties assigned to each scheduled recording (channel ID, start time, end time, description, shutdown type, action type, auto-repeat days, enabled/disabled). Which must be equal, which not? Think about it carefully, and consider all possible eventualities, because we will redirect all user complaints to you Quote Link to comment
Derrick Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 In case the timers are programmed from events in the epg, all paramters of the same event should be equal cos they are set by the DVBViewer itself Quote Link to comment
Griga Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 The user may want to change one of the properties after the recording has been scheduled via EPG (for convenience). Quote Link to comment
Derrick Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 If the user modifies the parameters by hand he will rightly get 2 recordings. Nobody would be so stupid to program manually twice the same Quote Link to comment
mr_chaela Posted January 25, 2008 Author Share Posted January 25, 2008 (edited) I would think something like: IF __schedule event exists AND everything identical THEN __ignore would do the trick with no user intervention - after all, who would want to create multiple copies of the same file. Edited January 25, 2008 by mr_chaela Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.